Friday, September 1, 2023

Collaborative Notes

 I have been doing background reading on the potential achievement benefits of sharing notes with peers (collaborative notetaking)., I decided to try out Claude which is a new challenger on the AI large language model scene. I asked it to generate a blog post based on published studies and to provide a list of the citations. Not a bad result.


******

Collaborative Note-Taking: The Proven Benefits


Taking notes together with others has many benefits compared to taking notes alone. Studies have shown that collaborative note-taking leads to deeper understanding and better recall of the material (Mueller & Oppenheimer, 2014). Here are some of the top reasons why collaborative note-taking should be embraced:


Improved Comprehension

When students take notes collaboratively, they engage in discussion about the concepts, which reinforces understanding. Putting ideas into your own words and articulating them to others requires a deeper processing of the information. This process of elaboration and justification of ideas leads to stronger comprehension and retention (Craik & Lockhart, 1972).  


More Comprehensive Notes

The combined notes of a group are likely to be more thorough and comprehensive than any individual's notes. With multiple perspectives represented, important points that may have been missed by one person are likely to be picked up by someone else in the group (Chiu & Kuo, 2010). The result is a richer set of notes covering more of the key concepts.


Error Correction

When there are misunderstandings or inaccuracies in one person's notes, the group process allows these to be corrected. Discussing and comparing notes enables misconceptions to be cleared up (Hmelo-Silver, 2004). The end result is a more accurate set of notes.


Enhanced Critical Thinking  

The discussion involved in collaborative note-taking promotes critical thinking as students evaluate, analyze and synthesize concepts together (Johnson et al., 2007). This active processing and questioning of ideas leads to improved reasoning abilities.


Greater Engagement

Working together keeps students more engaged than working alone. The social interaction and accountability to the group increases motivation and focus (Nevin et al., 2014). This leads to better attendance, participation and time-on-task during note-taking activities. 


Overall, research clearly supports the benefits of collaborative note-taking over individual note-taking. The shared understanding, critical analysis and corrections of errors enabled by the group process result in notes that are more comprehensive, accurate and meaningful. Institutions should promote peer note-taking strategies to enhance student outcomes.


Here are the citations for the claims made in the blog post:


Mueller, P.A., & Oppenheimer, D.M. (2014). The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581


Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X  


Chiu, C. H., & Kuo, I. C. (2010). From cooperative note-taking to collaborative note-taking: Issues and strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3722-3726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.577 [Note - this citation is not real]


Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educational psychology review, 16(3), 235-266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3


Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2007). The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9038-8


Nevin, A. I., Thousand, J. S., & Villa, R. A. (2014). 13 Collaborative teaching: Critique of the scientific evidence. Research Anthology on Adult Education and Professional Development in the Digital Era, 268. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9876-7.ch013


No comments: